![]() |
Courtesy of www.dailynewsegypt.com |
Last
week, nearly two years after Mubarak's toppling, the first democratically
elected congress in Egyptian history has drafted a constitution, hoping to usher
in a new civil and democratic era for Egypt. President Mohammed Morsi has signed the
constitutional draft and it now must go before the people in a popular
referendum.
What
has heretofore gone unmentioned in Western media coverage is the environmental
language that has been incorporated into the draft. Three articles within the constitution attempt to define, albeit vaguely,
the state's role in the protection, assurance, and governance of water
resources.
It's
been less than a week since the constitutional assembly tasked with writing
Egypt's new constitution finished its draft and submitted it for Morsi's
signature and a public referendum. The process has manifested intense, emotional responses from both sides: secular parties have protested the
draft itself, while Islamist supporters have protested Egypt's highest court's
ongoing investigation into the legitimacy of the legislative assembly.
All
conflict aside, Islamist parties retain power of the legislative and executive
branches of government, and they have broad and vocal support from the electorate, despite the
anti-government focus of Western news coverage. Therefore, I think it’s
reasonable to take the content of this constitutional draft seriously
Should
this legislation stand up to its many critics and become the absolute law of
the land, there will be protections afforded to the sacred Nile River that have, to date, never been considered so important to previous Egyptian governments and
that may have a considerable impact on the river's future.
So
here they are. I've listed three constitutional articles below, one that
directly refers to the country's most important resource and two others that
address the state's role in its protection.
Article 19
The Nile River and water resources are a national wealth. The
State is committed to maintaining and developing them, and preventing abuse.
The use of such resources shall be regulated by law.
Article 20
The State shall protect its coasts, seas, waterways and
lakes, maintain monuments and nature reserves, and remove any encroachments.
Article 69
All
individuals have the right to a healthy environment. The State shall safeguard
the environment against pollution, and promote the use of natural resources in
a manner that prevents damage to the environment and preserves the rights of
future generations.
If
you take a look through the previous constitution, adopted under Sadat's rule, you'll find no such language. There is no explicit
addressing of the need to "protect" natural resources and it does not
afford any public right to a "healthy environment". The mandate
handed to the state to "safeguard the environment against pollution"
is inspiring and unique to a country of Egypt's impoverished stature and
dedication to polluting industries such as petroleum extraction and production.
There
are obviously many questions that only time will sort out. The two that are at
the forefront of my mind are: will there be substantial domestic regulatory
agency reshuffling following the adoption of this new constitution? And, with
25% of Egyptian nationals living below the poverty level and an unemployment rate hovering around 12.5%,
will interpretation of Articles 19 and 69 and popular pressure favor
substantial or sustainable development?
While Egypt is still in the early stages of the democratic process and the constitutional draft isn't yet final, it's encouraging to see the new Egypt addressing and even attempting to
protect what is and will continue to be one of the country's most vital assets.
* A translation of the entire constitutional draft can be
found here
Article 69 has some pretty strong yet extremely ambiguous language in it. While I'd have to describe myself at being rather clueless about Egyptian politics and the proposed constitutive processes for resolving disputes and clarifying laws, if actively enforced, those provisions would inevitably produce some drastic results. Or it could easily just end up being empty language if it's interpreted broadly. It will be interesting to see what happens in this respect. Thanks for the post! ~Lisa C.
ReplyDeleteIt's too bad that the mainstream press isn't covering any of this -- I blame the lack of specialist environment and science reporters in today's newsrooms. Needless to say, I'm glad you're writing about it! It's heartening to see that with democracy comes environmental protection, since I would argue that justice is integral to both. Fingers crossed that Article 69 ends up on the right side of history.
ReplyDelete